Maintenance care in chiropractic - what do we know?


Back problems are often recurring or chronic. It is therefore not surprising that chiropractors wish to prevent their return or reduce their impact.

This is often attempted with a long-term treatment strategy, commonly called maintenance care. However, some aspects of maintenance care are considered controversial.

It is therefore relevant to investigate the scientific evidence forming the basis for its use.Objectives: A review of the literature was performed in order to obtain answers to the following questions: What is the exact definition of maintenance care, what are its indications for use, and how is it practised? How common is it that chiropractors support the concept of maintenance care, and how well accepted is it by patients? How frequently is maintenance care used, and what factors are associated with its use? Is maintenance care a clinically valid method of approach, and is it cost-effective for the patient?

Results: Thirteen original studies were found, in which maintenance care was investigated. The relative paucity of studies, the obvious bias in many of these, the lack of exhaustive information, and the diversity of findings made it impossible to answer any of the questions.

Conclusion: There is no evidence-based definition of maintenance care and the indications for and nature of its use remain to be clearly stated.

It is likely that many chiropractors believe in the usefulness of maintenance care but it seems to be less well accepted by their patients. The prevalence with which maintenance care is used has not been established.

Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of maintenance care for various types of conditions are unknown. Therefore, our conclusion is identical to that of a similar review published in 1996, namely that maintenance care is not well researched and that it needs to be investigated from several angles before the method is subjected to a multi-centre trial.

Author: Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde and Lise Hestbaek
Credits/Source: Chiropractic &Osteopathy 2008, 16:3



Published on: 2008-05-08



Copyright by the authors listed above - made available via BioMedCentral (Open Access). Please make sure to read our disclaimer prior to contacting 7thSpace Interactive. To contact our editors, visit our online helpdesk. If you wish submit your own press release, click here.

Social Bookmarking
RETWEET This! | Digg this! | Post to del.icio.us | Post to Furl | Add to Netscape | Add to Yahoo! | Rojo



Comments Page 1 of 1
Dr. Robert Bean
Posted 1478 days ago
As a doctor of chiropractic I would like to add my comment. I agree that more standardized clinical trials are necessary to determine efficacy of maintenance care. However, the perception that Chiropractors promote maintenance care only to line their pockets with money is very demoralizing. We Chiropractors that promote maintenance care is not based on clinical trials or paper evidence at all, it is simply based on experience. As it is with me. I love getting adjusted regularly. It just feels right, it feels good. I feel better after an adjustment. It helps my back stay in a more correct alignment. It maintains my spines flexibility. Anytime my back is hurting after a long day of adjusting other people, I get immediate relief. I don't need clinical trials to tell me chiropractic maintenance care works. But for the scientific community to accept its use. Yes, we could use some long term studies to show that it does extend the life of your spine, and prevent future debilitating spinal injuries, as well as maintaining a feeling of wellness.
Food for thought.
Robert D. Bean, DC
drbean@sequimchiropractic.com
 


+ Add New Comment


Custom Search

Username
Password










© 2012 7thSpace Interactive
All Rights Reserved - About | Disclaimer | Helpdesk
There are currently 34459 people browsing 7thSpace